Systems and methods for reducing undesired eddy currents

ABSTRACT

Systems and methods to reduce the amplitude of undesirable eddy currents in conducting structures, e.g., induced by the translation of an FRC into a confinement chamber, while leaving beneficial eddy currents unaffected. This is achieved by inducing opposing currents in the same conducting structures prior to plasma translation into the confinement chamber.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The subject application is a continuation of PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US16/31539, filed May 9, 2016, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/160,421, filed on May 12, 2015, both of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety for all purposes.

FIELD

The subject matter described herein relates generally to magnetic plasma confinement systems and, more particularly, to systems and methods that facilitate cancellation of undesired eddy currents.

BACKGROUND

The Field Reversed Configuration (FRC) belongs to the class of magnetic plasma confinement topologies known as compact toroids (CT). It exhibits predominantly poloidal magnetic fields and possesses zero or small self-generated toroidal fields (see M. Tuszewski, Nucl. Fusion 28, 2033 (1988)). The traditional method of forming an FRC uses the field-reversed θ-pinch technology, producing hot, high-density plasmas (see A. L. Hoffman et al., Nucl. Fusion 33, 27 (1993)). A variation on this is the translation-trapping method in which the plasma created in a theta-pinch “source” is more-or-less immediately ejected out one end into a confinement chamber. The translating plasmoid is then trapped between two strong mirrors at the ends of the chamber (see, for instance, H. Himura et al., Phys. Plasmas 2, 191 (1995)).

Significant progress has been made in the last decade developing other FRC formation methods: merging spheromaks with oppositely-directed helicities (see, e.g. Y. Ono et al., Nucl. Fusion 39, 2001 (1999)) and by driving current with rotating magnetic fields (RMF) (see, e.g. I. R. Jones, Phys. Plasmas 6, 1950 (1999)) which also provides additional stability. Recently, the collision-merging technique, proposed long ago (see, e.g. D. R. Wells, Phys. Fluids 9, 1010 (1966)) has been significantly developed further: two separate theta-pinches at opposite ends of a confinement chamber simultaneously generate two plasmoids and accelerate the plasmoids toward each other at high speed; they then collide at the center of the confinement chamber and merge to form a compound FRC. In the construction and successful operation of one of the largest FRC experiments to date, the conventional collision-merging method was shown to produce stable, long-lived, high-flux, high temperature FRCs (see, e.g. M. Binderbauer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 045003 (2010)).

When an FRC translates into the confinement section, it induces eddy currents in any conducting structure within its vicinity (e.g. the vessel wall or conducting in-vessel components). These eddy currents influence the plasma state and decay over time, thereby contributing to a continuous evolution of the plasma and preventing any steady-state until the eddy currents have decayed to negligible magnitudes. If the conducting structures are not axisymmetric (which is generally the case), the eddy currents break the axisymmetry of the FRC. Overall, such translation-induced eddy currents are undesirable. Their initial excitation imposes constraints on the plasma shape and thereby limits the ability of conducting structures to provide passive stabilization of plasma instabilities, and their decay over time complicates plasma control by requiring continuous compensation even in the absence of plasma instabilities. Furthermore, any beneficial effects of translation-induced eddy currents can also be provided by suitable adjustments of the equilibrium magnetic field.

Translation-induced eddy currents are not the only type of eddy currents that arise during experiments. Plasma instabilities may excite eddy currents which reduce the growth rate of the instability and are thus desirable. Eddy currents will also arise in response to neutral beam current ramp-up.

Plasma lifetimes in other FRC experiments have typically been limited to values significantly lower than the resistive timescale of the conducting wall, so that time-varying eddy currents did not pose any practical problems and have not been receiving much attention.

One related technique to prevent the excitation of translation-induced eddy currents is the use of insulating axial “gaps” in the vessel to prevent the excitation of axisymmetric eddy currents. The drawback of this method is that it requires structural changes to the conducting vessel, and that eddy currents are not suppressed but axisymmetric currents are transformed into 3-D currents. This thus aggravates the detrimental effects from 3-D fields and also makes the wall unsuitable for passive stabilization of axisymmetric plasma instabilities.

Three dimensional error fields are often corrected by error field correction coils that are themselves not axisymmetric. In the best case, such coils can eliminate as many harmonics as there are coils, but they tend to introduce new errors in the remaining harmonics and need to be able to follow any time-variation of the error fields during the experiment.

Therefore, it is desirable to provide systems and methods that facilitate the reduction or elimination of undesirable eddy currents.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

Embodiments provided herein are directed to systems and methods that facilitate the reduction in amplitude of undesirable eddy currents (wall currents), e.g., translation-induced eddy currents such as eddy currents induce by translation of FRC plasmas, while leaving beneficial eddy currents unaffected. The reduction in amplitude of undesirable eddy currents is achieved by inducing opposing currents in the same structures prior to plasma translation, for example using active coils. If both tangential and normal components of the total magnetic field on a surface separating the plasma from the conducting structures are measured, the field can be decomposed into components produced by the plasma and components produced by exterior currents (eg. equilibrium coil currents). By subtracting the known fields from exterior coils, the field due to eddy current remains. The corresponding eddy current distribution can be reconstructed from the time evolution of this field. With the eddy current distribution known, active coils are used to induce a similar distribution with an opposite sign before the plasma translates into the chamber. Calculating the necessary coil currents requires knowledge of only the geometry of the active coils and passive structures. When the plasma translates into the confinement chamber, the two eddy current distributions superimpose and cancel. The more exact the eddy current distribution is reproduced, the more complete is the cancellation.

The systems and methods described herein advantageously:

-   -   reduce time-varying external fields due to decaying eddy         currents, which interfere with plasma control;     -   reduce symmetry-breaking effects of a non-axisymmetric wall;         since both pre-induced and translation-induced eddy currents         have the same 3-D structure, 3-D fields are reduced without the         need for non-axisymmetric coils; and     -   enable the installation of close fitting, axisymmetric,         in-vessel structures to increase passive stabilization of         axisymmetric and non-axisymmetric instabilities.

Other systems, methods, features and advantages of the example embodiments will be or will become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following figures and detailed description.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES

The details of the example embodiments, including structure and operation, may be gleaned in part by study of the accompanying figures, in which like reference numerals refer to like parts. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. Moreover, all illustrations are intended to convey concepts, where relative sizes, shapes and other detailed attributes may be illustrated schematically rather than literally or precisely.

FIG. 1 is a schematic of a chamber or vessel with formation tubes attached to opposing ends and axisymmetric coils positioned around the wall of the chamber for inducing eddy currents in the wall of the chamber (wall currents).

FIG. 1A is a schematic showing a control system coupled to an active coil system and a formation system.

FIG. 2 is a schematic of the chamber and formation tubes in FIG. 1 with a plasma present in the formation tube.

FIG. 3 is a schematic of the chamber and formation tubes in FIG. 1 following translation of the plasma into the chamber and showing translation-induced eddy currents formed in the wall of the chamber (translation induced wall currents).

FIG. 4 is the chamber and formation tubes in FIG. 1 prior to translation of the plasma into the chamber with pre-induced eddy currents formed in the wall of the chamber (pre-induced wall currents).

FIG. 5 is the chamber and formation tubes in FIG. 1 following translation of the plasma into the chamber and showing the pre-induced and translation-induced eddy currents in the wall of the chamber (pre-induced and translation-induced wall currents).

FIG. 6 is the chamber and formation tubes in FIG. 1 following translation of the plasma into the chamber and showing the translation-induced eddy currents in the wall of the chamber (translation induced wall currents) cancelled out by the pre-induced eddy currents in the wall of the chamber (pre-induced wall currents).

FIG. 7 is a graph showing the simulated eddy current distribution in an axisymmetric wall of the chamber (simulated wall current distribution) for three (3) cases: (1) no pre-induced, (2) pre-induced, and (3) pre-induced and adjusted vacuum field.

It should be noted that elements of similar structures or functions are generally represented by like reference numerals for illustrative purpose throughout the figures. It should also be noted that the figures are only intended to facilitate the description of the preferred embodiments.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Each of the additional features and teachings disclosed below can be utilized separately or in conjunction with other features and teachings to provide systems and methods that facilitate the reduction in amplitude of undesirable eddy currents (wall currents), e.g., translation-induced eddy currents, while leaving beneficial eddy currents unaffected. Representative examples of the embodiments described herein, which examples utilize many of these additional features and teachings both separately and in combination, will now be described in further detail with reference to the attached drawings. This detailed description is merely intended to teach a person of skill in the art further details for practicing preferred aspects of the present teachings and is not intended to limit the scope of the invention. Therefore, combinations of features and steps disclosed in the following detail description may not be necessary to practice the invention in the broadest sense, and are instead taught merely to particularly describe representative examples of the present teachings.

Moreover, the various features of the representative examples and the dependent claims may be combined in ways that are not specifically and explicitly enumerated in order to provide additional useful embodiments of the present teachings. In addition, it is expressly noted that all features disclosed in the description and/or the claims are intended to be disclosed separately and independently from each other for the purpose of original disclosure, as well as for the purpose of restricting the claimed subject matter independent of the compositions of the features in the embodiments and/or the claims. It is also expressly noted that all value ranges or indications of groups of entities disclose every possible intermediate value or intermediate entity for the purpose of original disclosure, as well as for the purpose of restricting the claimed subject matter.

Embodiments provided herein are directed to systems and that facilitate the reduction in amplitude of undesirable eddy currents, e.g., translation-induced eddy currents such as eddy currents induced by translating FRC plasmas, while leaving beneficial eddy currents unaffected. The eddy currents induced by translating FRC plasmas do not depend on the prior field configuration or on the presence of prior currents. Therefore, if the currents induced by the plasma translation are undesirable, they can be eliminated by creating an equal and opposite current pattern before the plasma translates.

In practice, this can be achieved, as shown in FIG. 1, with axisymmetric active coils 20 positioned around the inside or the outside of the vessel 10. Plasmas, such as, e.g., FRC plasmas, are formed in and translated toward the mid-plane of the vessel 10 from formation tubes 12 and 14 positioned on opposing ends of the vessel 10. A detailed discussion of systems and methods for forming and maintaining an FRC plasma is provided in published PCT Application No. WO 2015048092, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/881,874 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/001,583, which applications are incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full.

As shown in FIG. 1A, a control system 100 is coupled to an active coil system 200 comprising the active coils 20, power supplies and the like, and to a formation system comprising the formation tubes 12 and 14, coils or straps, power supplies and the like.

Prior to plasma translation from the formation tubes 12 and 14, the coils 20 are ramped-up and held at constant current until all eddy currents in the wall of the vessel 10 have decayed. At this point current to the coils 20 is interrupted and the plasma formation sequence is started. The interruption of current to the coils 20 will excite a specific eddy current distribution in the wall of the vessel 10 to conserve the flux through the vessel 10, until a subsequent flux injection from the translating plasma reduces the eddy currents in the wall of the vessel 10 back towards zero. Alternatively, the coils 20 may be quickly ramped-up just before the plasma translates. In this case, the quick ramp-up will produce the desired eddy current distribution in the wall of the vessel 10, and the subsequent flux injection from the translated plasma will bring the eddy currents back to zero. After translation, currents in the coils 20 are kept constant. This method may be used if the characteristic eddy current decay time of the wall 10 is sufficiently slow compared to the rate at which the coils 20 can be ramped up. Cancellation can generally be increased by optimizing the geometry of the active coils, but even with the active coil geometry prescribed, the eddy current amplitude can be reduced.

To determine the currents in the active coils that will maximize eddy current cancellation, the eddy current distribution induced by the plasma has to be measured. This can be done by measuring at least two components of the magnetic field in the region between the conducting structures and the plasma. With two components of the magnetic field known, the magnetic field can then be separated into components due to the plasma and due to external currents. This is easily seen in a cylindrical geometry, i.e., for a given mode number m and phase, the magnetic scalar potential is determined by two amplitudes, one for the term proportional to r^(m), and the other for the term proportional to r^(−m). Having two measurements of the magnetic field at the same spatial point allows solving for both coefficients, and the field from the plasma is trivially identified with the term proportional to r^(m). In more complicated geometries the mathematics are not as straightforward but the same procedure can be used. With the time evolution of both the internal and external magnetic field known, the current distribution in the conducting structures can be computed by least-squares fitting to a finite-element circuit model.

FIGS. 2-6 illustrate the basic idea of reducing translation-induced eddy currents. Plasma currents (white filled), plasma induced wall currents (gray filled), and pre-induced wall currents (cross-hatched filled) are shown in the figures in two stages, i.e., 1) prior to translation and 2) after translation. In FIGS. 2 and 3, no wall currents have been pre-induced in the wall of the vessel 10, so the net current in the wall is a non-zero value after translation of the plasma from the formation tubes 12 and 14. In FIGS. 4-6, some currents have been pre-induced in the wall of the vessel 10. After translation of the plasma from the formation tubes 12 and 14, the net current in the wall becomes zero.

Application of the proposed technique has been simulated using LamyRidge, a 2-fluid simulation code to evaluate its effects on plasma formation and translation. FIG. 7 shows the eddy current distribution in an axisymmetric wall two hundred microseconds (200 ms) after formation for three different cases:

-   -   1) In case 1         , no eddy current compensation was utilized, resulting in a         plasma with separatrix radius 39 cm and elongation 2.5.     -   2) In case 2         an (exactly) opposing current pattern was put on the wall prior         to start of the formation. As expected, the amplitude of the         eddy currents at the end of the simulation is reduced. The         currents do not cancel exactly, because the presence of the         pre-induced currents results in an expansion of the plasma, so         that it reaches a radius of 46 cm with an elongation of 2.0.     -   3) In Case 3         in addition to pre-inducing eddy currents in the chamber wall,         the currents in the confinement coils are adjusted to compensate         for the suppressed eddy currents. In other words, the field         produced by the confinement coils in case 3 at t=0 is now equal         to the field produced by both confinement coils and eddy         currents in case 1 at t=200 us. This results in a plasma that is         very similar to case 1 (radius 38 cm, elongation 2.5), but the         eddy currents have been reduced by a factor of 10. Subsequent         evolution of this plasma is therefore much less affected by wall         eddy currents and thus easier to control and predict.         Furthermore, by adjusting the pre-induced wall currents together         with the confinement coils, the plasma separatrix radius can be         directly controlled.         Other Advantages

To stabilize FRC position or shape, axisymmetric, conducting in-vessel passive structures may be used. If eddy currents are pre-induced in the in-vessel passive structures in a manner as described above, the in-vessel passive structures can be installed without affecting initial plasma shape and configuration. If, on the other hand, no currents are pre-induced, installation of the in-vessel passive structures will decrease the FRC radius and thus reduce the coupling between in-vessel passive structures and plasma to approximate the same coupling strength that was previously between the wall of the vessel and the plasma, neglecting much of the advantage of installing additional components in the vessel

A similar issue applies to control coils. Where ex-vessel coils have insufficient plasma coupling to stabilize plasma instabilities and in-vessel coils are used, the in-vessel coils need to be protected from the plasma typically with an additional internal wall. If eddy currents in this in-vessel coil wall are not eliminated, they will reduce the plasma radius and the intended increase in coil-plasma coupling will be reduced. Therefore, eliminating eddy currents increases the coupling between coils and plasma, and thus reduces both current and voltage requirements for control coils.

Due to the 3-D shape of the vessel, any induced wall currents will break axisymmetry and potentially reduce confinement, excite instabilities, or otherwise reduce performance. Error field correction coils can be used to reduce a fixed number of specific harmonics, but are non-axisymmetric themselves and thus further amplify other sideband harmonics. In contrast, elimination of the eddy currents as described above requires only axisymmetric coils, results in less sideband harmonics, and does not require any currents in the coils after the plasma has formed.

In summary, the proposed systems and methods provided herein increase the chance of stabilizing plasma instabilities; increase the efficiency of plasma control systems by improving the coupling to the wall, reduces the amplitude of symmetry breaking 3-D fields, and lowers the complexity of the real-time systems. Up to some degree, all of these advantages can also be realized with very little cost by re-using existing coil systems. Best results can be achieved by taking eddy current elimination into account for coil placement and design.

The example embodiments provided herein advantageously reduces time-varying external fields due to decaying eddy currents, which interfere with plasma control; reduces symmetry-breaking effects of a non-axisymmetric wall (since both pre-induced and translation-induced eddy currents have the same 3-D structure, 3-D fields are reduced without the need for non-axisymmetric coils) and enables the installation of close fitting, axisymmetric, in-vessel structures to increase passive stabilization of axisymmetric and non-axisymmetric instabilities.

The example embodiments provided herein, however, are merely intended as illustrative examples and not to be limiting in any way.

In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. For example, the reader is to understand that the specific ordering and combination of process actions shown in the process flow diagrams described herein is merely illustrative, unless otherwise stated, and the invention can be performed using different or additional process actions, or a different combination or ordering of process actions. As another example, each feature of one embodiment can be mixed and matched with other features shown in other embodiments. Features and processes known to those of ordinary skill may similarly be incorporated as desired. Additionally and obviously, features may be added or subtracted as desired. Accordingly, the invention is not to be restricted except in light of the attached claims and their equivalents. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for reducing undesired eddy currents induced in a conducting structure, the method comprising the steps of: inducing a first set of eddy currents in a conducting structure, and translating a plasma into the conducting structure, wherein the plasma translating into the plasma confinement vessel to inducing a second set of eddy currents in the conducting structure, wherein the first set of eddy currents being induced prior to the second set of eddy currents and having a distribution equal to and opposite in sign to the distribution of the second set of eddy currents to substantial cancel the second set of eddy currents upon inducement of the second set of eddy currents in the conducting structure.
 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the conducting structure is a wall of a plasma confinement vessel.
 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of inducing eddy currents in a conducting structure includes the steps of ramping up and holding coils about the conducting structure at a constant current until all eddy currents have decayed in the conducting structure, and interrupting current to the coils to allow the first set of eddy currents to excite in the conducting structures conserving the magnetic flux through the structures.
 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the translating plasma injects a flux into the conducting structure that induces the second set of eddy currents in the conducting structure reducing the amplitude of eddy currents in the conducting structure back towards zero.
 5. The method of claim 3 wherein the translating plasma injects a flux into the conducting structure that induces the second set of eddy currents in the conducting structure reducing the amplitude of eddy currents in the wall of the vessel back towards zero.
 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of inducing a first set of eddy currents in a conducting structure includes the steps of ramping up and holding coils about the conducting structure at a constant current to produce the first set of eddy currents in the conducting structure, and wherein the translating plasma injects a flux into the conducting structure that induces the second set of eddy currents in the conducting structure reducing the amplitude of eddy currents in the conducting structure back towards zero.
 7. A system for reducing undesired eddy currents induced in a vessel wall, the system comprising: a vessel having a wall and an interior, a formation section attached to an end of the vessel, a plurality coils positioned around the vessel, and a control system coupled to the plurality of coils and configured to induce a first set of eddy currents in the wall of the vessel prior to a second set of eddy currents being induced in the wall of the vessel, wherein the first set of eddy currents having a distribution equal to and opposite in sign to the distribution of the second set of eddy currents to substantial cancel the second set of eddy currents upon inducement of the second set of eddy currents in the wall of the chamber, wherein the control system is further configured to translate a plasma from the formation section into the interior of the vessel, wherein the translating plasma induces the second set of eddy currents in the wall of the vessel.
 8. The system of claim 7 wherein the control system is further configured to ramp up and hold the plurality of coils at a constant current until all eddy currents in the wall of the vessel have decayed, and then interrupt the current to the plurality of coils to allow the first set of eddy currents to excite in the wall of the vessel conserving the flux through the vessel.
 9. The system of claim 8 wherein the translating plasma injects a flux into the wall of the vessel that induces the second set of eddy currents in the wall of the vessel reducing the amplitude of eddy currents in the wall of the vessel back towards zero.
 10. The system of claim 7 wherein the control system is further configured to ramp up and hold the plurality of coils at a constant current to produce the first set of eddy currents in the conducting structure.
 11. The system of claim 10 wherein the translating plasma injects a flux into the wall of the vessel that induces the second set of eddy currents in the wall of the vessel reducing the amplitude of eddy currents in the wall of the vessel back towards zero.
 12. A method for reducing undesired eddy currents induced in a wall of a vessel, the method comprising the steps of: inducing a first set of eddy currents in a wall of a vessel having a wall and an interior prior to inducing a second set of eddy currents in the wall of the vessel, and translating a plasma into the vessel, wherein the plasma translating into the plasma confinement vessel inducing a second set of eddy currents in the wall of the vessel, wherein the first set of eddy currents having a distribution equal to and opposite in sign to the distribution of the second set of eddy currents to substantial cancel the second set of eddy currents upon inducement of the second set of eddy currents in the wall of the vessel.
 13. The method of claim 12 wherein the step of inducing eddy currents in the wall of the vessel includes the steps of ramping up and holding a plurality of coils positioned about the wall of the vessel at a constant current until all eddy currents have decayed in the wall of the vessel, and interrupting current to the plurality of coils to allow the first set of eddy currents to excite in the wall of the vessel conserving the magnetic flux through the wall of the vessel.
 14. The method of claim 12 wherein the translating plasma injects a flux into the wall of the vessels that induces the second set of eddy currents in the wall of the vessel reducing the amplitude of eddy currents in the wall of the vessel back towards zero.
 15. The method of claim 13 wherein the translating plasma injects a flux into the wall of the vessels that induces the second set of eddy currents in the wall of the vessel reducing the amplitude of eddy currents in the wall of the vessel back towards zero.
 16. The method of claim 12 wherein the plasma is translated from opposing formation sections attached to opposite ends of the vessel.
 17. The method of claim 16, further comprising the step of forming an FRC plasma in the opposing formation sections and wherein the step of translating a plasma into the vessel comprises translating the FRC plasma into the vessel.
 18. The method of claim 12 wherein the step of inducing eddy currents in the wall of the vessel includes the steps of ramping up and holding a plurality of coils positioned about the wall of the vessel at a constant current to produce the first set of eddy currents in the wall of the vessel, and wherein the translating plasma injects a flux into the wall of the vessel that induces the second set of eddy currents in the wall of the vessel reducing the amplitude of eddy currents in the wall of the vessel back towards zero.
 19. The method of claim 18 wherein the plasma is translated from opposing formation sections attached to opposite ends of the vessel.
 20. The method of claim 19, further comprising the step of forming a field reversed configuration (FRC) plasma in the opposing formation sections and wherein the step of translating a plasma into the vessel comprises translating the FRC plasma into the vessel. 